World
Controversy Over Vehicular Access to Mitrovica Bridge in Kosovo
Explore the ongoing controversy surrounding vehicular access to the Mitrovica Bridge in Kosovo. This critical infrastructure issue highlights ethnic tensions and political challenges in the region, affecting daily life and community relations.
Controversy Surrounds Vehicle Access to Mitrovica Bridge
A crucial bridge connecting the Serbian ethnic minority in the city of Mitrovica, Kosovo, with the Albanian ethnic majority will not be authorized for vehicular use, despite previous intentions to do so. Kosovo’s Prime Minister, Albin Kurti, had initially announced plans to reopen the main bridge over the Ibar River for vehicle traffic in early August. However, he reversed this decision following significant backlash from the local Serbian community and a critical meeting with CIA Director William Burns, who visited Kosovo in late August.
During this meeting, Kurti stated, “We also discussed the issue of opening the central bridge over the Ibar River in Mitrovica, for which we had all the necessary consultations. However, the maintenance works are equally important, including addressing the preliminary draft concerning the physical stability of the bridge.” The Ibar River bridge serves as a dividing line between the northern and southern parts of Mitrovica, where the Serbian minority resides in the north and the Albanian majority in the south.
When the plans to allow vehicle access were first disclosed, there was immediate concern from various stakeholders, including the Serbian community, the Serbian government, the European Union, and NATO. Many expressed fears that such a move would exacerbate ethnic tensions and pose risks to the safety of ethnic Serbs in the region. This apprehension was further amplified when hundreds gathered in protest at the bridge, which has come to symbolize the deep divisions within the city.
The bridge has been off-limits to non-pedestrian vehicles since 2011, following the establishment of barricades by ethnic Serbs. Additionally, authorities in Serbia condemned the proposal to reopen the bridge, labeling it as Kosovo’s attempt “to provoke conflict.” Notably, discussions regarding the bridge were part of the EU-mediated talks between Serbia and Kosovo in 2015, highlighting its significance in the ongoing dialogue about the region’s stability.