Connect with us

World

Concerns Rise Over Deep-Sea Mining Regulations and Environmental Impact

Explore the growing concerns surrounding deep-sea mining regulations and their potential environmental impact. Delve into the challenges faced by policymakers and the urgent need for sustainable practices to protect our oceans.

Published

on

Concerns Over Deep-Sea Mining Regulations Intensify

Environmental activists are increasingly alarmed by the ongoing efforts to establish regulations that will govern the future of commercial deep-sea mining for minerals and metals in international waters. Since July 15, the International Seabed Authority (ISA)—an organization established under the auspices of the United Nations in 1994—has been engaged in negotiations during meetings of its governing bodies in Jamaica.

In light of these developments, three European NGOs (WeMove Europe, Seas At Risk, and the Deep Sea Conservation Coalition) commissioned an Ipsos survey, conducted in Belgium, Poland, and Italy, with a sample size of 3,000 participants. The results revealed that 56% of respondents oppose deep-sea mining and advocate for a temporary ban on this emerging industry. Another 33% expressed conditional support for mining, provided that environmental damage is minimized. Only 7% remained neutral, while a mere 4% endorsed mining without any reservations.

“Scientists caution us that we require more time to fully understand the complexities of the seabed,” stated Rachel Walker-Konno, a campaigner at WeMove Europe, in an interview with Euronews. “Just last week, a significant discovery was made regarding polymetallic nodules—rocks containing the minerals targeted by mining companies—which revealed that these nodules are capable of producing oxygen. This finding fundamentally alters our understanding of oxygen production, as it occurs in the deep sea, devoid of sunlight,” she elaborated.

A Call for a Ban or Suspension?

Scientists are sounding alarms about the necessity of understanding the potential impacts of deep-sea mining on ecosystems, fish populations, and the ocean’s capacity to sequester and store carbon dioxide. Currently, only 31 countries worldwide support either a ban, moratorium, or precautionary pause on deep-sea mining activities, with 10 of these being members of the European Union. France stands out as the sole EU member advocating for a complete ban. Meanwhile, a temporary pause until more data is gathered is championed by Denmark, Sweden, Finland, Germany, Portugal, Spain, Ireland, Greece, and Malta.

Two years prior, the European Commission promoted a “Joint Communication on the EU Agenda for International Ocean Governance”, which called for a ban until sufficient evidence is provided that deep-sea mining can be conducted safely. The document emphasizes that mining should only proceed when “scientific gaps are adequately filled” and when there is concrete assurance that “no harmful effects will occur” and that “the marine environment will be effectively protected.”

Over the past year, numerous global financial institutions, as well as companies in the fishing, technology, and automotive sectors, have joined scientists and indigenous groups in advocating for a cessation of deep-sea mining activities.

Evaluating the Utility of These Metals

Since the 1960s, the ISA has signed approximately 30 contracts for the exploration of polymetallic nodules (PMN), polymetallic sulphides (PMS), and cobalt-rich ferromanganese crusts (CFC) on the seabed. These minerals include copper, nickel, iron, manganese, cobalt, and rare earth elements. The contracts aim to explore the commercial viability of these resources, involving both governmental and private entities. The areas earmarked for prospecting include the Clarion-Clipperton Fracture Zone in the Central Indian Ocean Basin, the Western Pacific Ocean, the Southwest and Central Indian Ridges, and the Mid-Atlantic Ridge.

Several EU nations are involved in these ventures, including Germany, France, Belgium, Italy, Poland, and Czechia. Many governments are eager to secure new sources of minerals essential for modern technologies, such as electrical batteries and semiconductors. However, activists argue that pursuing this route may not be worthwhile. “Through deep-sea mining, we primarily extract polymetallic nodules that contain manganese, along with some nickel, cobalt, and copper. Many of these minerals are being replaced in contemporary clean technologies, and crucial minerals like lithium are not found in these nodules,” explains Rachel Walker-Konno.

Progress in Canada and Norway

Canada, operating under the TMC company, may submit a license application for commercial operations in international waters as early as 2025, specifically in the Clarion-Clipperton Zone (CCZ)—a vast expanse situated between Hawaii and Mexico. The timeline for this move hinges on whether the International Seabed Authority will finalize a legal framework by then.

A key factor in determining the direction of the ISA is the upcoming election for the secretary general on Friday. The current deputy secretary general, Michael Lodge (from the United Kingdom), is campaigning with a strongly pro-industry stance, advocating for the swift adoption of regulations.

Letícia Carvalho, a Brazilian oceanographer and former oil and gas regulator, advocates for greater caution and believes that further research should be conducted for several more years. According to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), established in 1982, the seabed beyond national jurisdiction is deemed the “common heritage of humanity,” and its utilization should benefit the “global development of all countries.”

Meanwhile, Norway has announced its intent to commence commercial activities in its territorial waters imminently. On January 9, a vote in the national parliament granted approval for deep-sea mining across an area encompassing 281,000 square kilometers around the Arctic archipelago of Svalbard.

World

Dominique Pelicot Testifies in Harrowing Rape Trial

Join us as Dominique Pelicot courageously testifies in a harrowing rape trial, shedding light on the complexities of trauma and justice. Her powerful story raises crucial questions about the legal system and the importance of support for survivors.

Published

on

Dominique Pelicot Takes the Stand in Shocking Rape Trial

In a courtroom drama that has captivated France and garnered international attention, Dominique Pelicot, the man at the center of a harrowing rape trial, finally addressed the court. With tears streaming down his face, he recounted how his wife had been instrumental in helping him cope with a tumultuous past marked by trauma. He revealed that he had endured a sexual assault at the tender age of nine while hospitalized, and he also witnessed a gang rape during his teenage years while working as an apprentice electrician on a construction site.

“She didn’t deserve this, I acknowledge that,” Mr. Pelicot stated, his voice barely audible as he struggled to convey his emotions. The gravity of the situation weighed heavily on him, and the courtroom fell silent, straining to catch his every word.

Now 71 years old, Mr. Pelicot faces serious allegations of drugging his wife, Gisèle Pelicot, whom he has been married to for half a century, over a span of nearly ten years. Prosecutors contend that he used drugs to render her comatose, allowing him to rape her repeatedly. Furthermore, authorities allege that he went so far as to invite numerous men into their home, facilitating a nightmarish scenario where they, too, engaged in the assault of his wife.

Overall, 51 men, including Mr. Pelicot, are on trial concurrently, primarily facing charges related to the aggravated rape of Ms. Pelicot. Among them, one individual has already pleaded guilty to similar crimes, admitting to drugging his own wife to assault her and inviting Mr. Pelicot to partake in the horrific act while she was incapacitated.

Mr. Pelicot’s unexpected testimony came after a tumultuous start to the trial. Just a week in, he was stricken with severe health issues that forced him to miss four consecutive days in court. The head judge ultimately decided to postpone proceedings, as Mr. Pelicot was diagnosed with kidney stones, a kidney infection, and prostate complications, adding yet another layer of complexity to this already harrowing case.

Continue Reading

World

Meta Bans Russian State Media Outlets from Social Media Platforms

Explore the implications of Meta’s decision to ban Russian state media outlets from its social media platforms. Understand the impact on information dissemination and the ongoing battle against misinformation in the digital landscape.

Published

on

Meta Imposes Global Ban on Russian State Media Outlets

In a significant move, Meta Platforms, Inc., the parent company of Facebook, has announced the prohibition of Russian state media outlets, including RT (Russia Today) and Rossiya Segodnya, from all its social media platforms. The decision stems from the company’s concerns regarding the deceptive strategies employed by these media organizations to execute covert influence operations across the internet.

Meta made this announcement on Monday, emphasizing that the ban will be enforced worldwide across its various platforms, such as Instagram, WhatsApp, and Threads. The rollout of this ban is expected to take place over the coming days.

Statement from Meta

A spokesperson for Meta elaborated on the decision, stating, “After careful consideration, we have expanded our ongoing enforcement actions against Russian state media outlets. As a result, Rossiya Segodnya, RT, and other affiliated entities are now banned from our applications globally due to their involvement in foreign interference activities.”

For further insights into this development, watch the video in the player above.

Continue Reading

World

Trump Recalls Alleged Assassination Attempt While Golfing

Explore Donald Trump’s chilling recollection of an alleged assassination attempt he experienced while enjoying a round of golf. Delve into the tense moments and his reflections on safety, fame, and the unpredictability of public life.

Published

on

In a recent interview on the social media platform X, Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump recounted a harrowing incident he claims to have experienced while playing golf. Trump described how, during a peaceful Sunday morning round with friends, the tranquility of the day was abruptly shattered by the sound of gunfire in the air.

“It was a beautiful day, everything was just perfect,” Trump reflected. “Then all of a sudden, we heard shots being fired—probably around four or five in total.” He went on to explain that a Secret Service agent was the first to spot the suspect, who was allegedly armed with an AK-47, a powerful assault rifle.

“The agent saw the barrel of the weapon and immediately took action, returning fire at the barrel and aiming in the direction of the bushes,” Trump detailed. “I would have loved to have sunk that last putt, but we decided it was best to leave the scene promptly.”

Trump expressed his gratitude towards the agents and a vigilant civilian who aided in tracking down the suspect, who was eventually apprehended following a high-speed chase.

Suspect Faces Multiple Federal Gun Charges

The FBI has identified the suspect as Ryan Wesley Routh, accusing him of targeting Trump during his time at the golf club in West Palm Beach, Florida. According to an FBI report, Routh had allegedly hidden among the hedges of the golf course for an astonishing 12 hours. Authorities discovered an SKS-style assault rifle, a GoPro camera, and a bag of food at the scene.

The 58-year-old Routh is now facing two serious federal gun charges. If convicted on both counts, he could face a combined maximum sentence of 20 years in prison. Notably, neither of the charges is directly related to an assassination attempt. The first charge pertains to possessing a firearm despite a prior felony conviction, which carries a potential 15-year sentence, a fine of $250,000 (€225,000), and three years of supervised release.

The second charge involves possession of a firearm with an obliterated serial number, which could result in a five-year prison term, the same financial penalties, and also three years of supervised release. As the investigation continues, additional charges could be forthcoming.

While the motive behind Routh’s actions remains unclear, his digital footprint reveals strong political affiliations, particularly concerning issues surrounding Ukraine and China. Routh consistently expressed support for Ukraine across various social media platforms, even claiming to have orchestrated a recruitment scheme for international volunteers aiming to assist Ukraine in its fight against Russia’s invasion. This behavior has been denounced by Ukrainian soldiers and members of the International Legion, who disavowed Routh’s actions and motives.

Continue Reading

Trending

NEWS info BALERT and balert.org