World

UN Committee Approves Controversial Cybercrime Treaty Amidst Human Rights Concerns

The UN Committee has greenlit a contentious cybercrime treaty, raising significant human rights concerns. Explore the implications of this decision and the ongoing debate surrounding digital freedoms and global cybersecurity.

Published

5 months ago

August 9, 2024

yönetici

UN Committee Approves Groundbreaking Cybercrime Treaty

A United Nations committee has endorsed the first global treaty focused on cybercrime, a decision that comes amidst significant opposition from human rights advocates and a coalition of technology companies. This historic treaty was adopted by consensus following three years of extensive negotiations, but it must still undergo a vote by the General Assembly in the fall, where it requires ratification from at least 40 nations.

The convention is designed to establish “a global criminal justice policy” aimed at protecting society from cybercrime by enhancing international cooperation, as detailed in the treaty draft.

Key Provisions of the Treaty

The treaty mandates that UN member states implement legislation that criminalizes unauthorized access to information and communications systems. Notably, it requires countries to prohibit the production and distribution of explicit child sexual content online and to protect children from online predators. Moreover, it seeks to prevent arrangements made online for the exploitation of minors. The treaty also addresses issues such as the misuse of devices, computer-related forgery, and theft.

Additionally, the treaty advocates for the creation of laws addressing deepfake technology and revenge porn that is disseminated online without the consent of the individuals involved. To facilitate the prosecution of these offenses, states would be allowed to “collect or record” relevant data necessary for convictions and to “compel” service providers to surrender incriminating information or documents.

Controversy and Opposition

The vote on the treaty came after several nations attempted to introduce last-minute modifications to the draft. Reports indicate that Russia, which initiated the treaty-making process in 2017, expressed concerns that the treaty contained excessive human rights safeguards and accused other countries of pursuing self-serving interests through the agreement. Notably, the last significant UN protocol on cybercrime was established in 2001 with the Budapest Convention, which many nations chose not to sign.

Industry and Human Rights Concerns

In a last-minute open letter prior to the vote, the Cybersecurity Tech Accord—a coalition representing various tech companies—argued that the revised draft was “ambiguous” and insufficient in addressing human rights, press freedom, and gender equality. The letter highlighted critical issues, urging member states to reject the treaty unless these concerns were adequately addressed.

Concerns regarding the potential for states to share personal information without detection.
Criminalization of “legitimate” online activities due to vague definitions of fraud and child sexual abuse.
Increased challenges for victims of cybercrime seeking justice.

“Global business does not support the text as it stands—it should be abandoned,” stated Nick Ashton-Hart, the head of the tech accord delegation, in a post on the social media platform X ahead of the vote.

Microsoft echoed this sentiment in their submission to the committee, expressing that their concerns “have not been addressed.” They further remarked that several harmful provisions have been broadened, limitations on the scope have been removed, and protections for human rights have been weakened.

The treaty has also faced backlash from various human rights organizations, including the UN’s Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR). In a July paper, the OHCHR urged negotiators to ensure that the Cybercrime Convention aligns with existing international law, advocating for a narrower list of criminal offenses to safeguard fundamental rights such as freedom of expression.

David Kaye, the former UN special rapporteur on freedom of expression, cautioned US negotiators against signing the treaty, labeling it a potential “disaster” for human rights protections on a global scale. He warned, “It will exert undue pressure on the DOJ to share information about alleged criminals without adequate protections for security researchers, journalists, opposition figures, and others.” Kaye concluded by remarking, “The result is a verbose and confusing treaty that will provide authoritarian regimes with more tools than it offers democracies in terms of protections.”

Up Next

The Enchantment of the Pont du Carrousel during the Paris Olympics

Don't Miss

Philippine Court Restores Rappler’s License: A Victory for Press Freedom

Click to comment

World

Dominique Pelicot Testifies in Harrowing Rape Trial

Join us as Dominique Pelicot courageously testifies in a harrowing rape trial, shedding light on the complexities of trauma and justice. Her powerful story raises crucial questions about the legal system and the importance of support for survivors.

Published

3 months ago

September 17, 2024

yönetici

Dominique Pelicot Takes the Stand in Shocking Rape Trial

In a courtroom drama that has captivated France and garnered international attention, Dominique Pelicot, the man at the center of a harrowing rape trial, finally addressed the court. With tears streaming down his face, he recounted how his wife had been instrumental in helping him cope with a tumultuous past marked by trauma. He revealed that he had endured a sexual assault at the tender age of nine while hospitalized, and he also witnessed a gang rape during his teenage years while working as an apprentice electrician on a construction site.

“She didn’t deserve this, I acknowledge that,” Mr. Pelicot stated, his voice barely audible as he struggled to convey his emotions. The gravity of the situation weighed heavily on him, and the courtroom fell silent, straining to catch his every word.

Now 71 years old, Mr. Pelicot faces serious allegations of drugging his wife, Gisèle Pelicot, whom he has been married to for half a century, over a span of nearly ten years. Prosecutors contend that he used drugs to render her comatose, allowing him to rape her repeatedly. Furthermore, authorities allege that he went so far as to invite numerous men into their home, facilitating a nightmarish scenario where they, too, engaged in the assault of his wife.

Overall, 51 men, including Mr. Pelicot, are on trial concurrently, primarily facing charges related to the aggravated rape of Ms. Pelicot. Among them, one individual has already pleaded guilty to similar crimes, admitting to drugging his own wife to assault her and inviting Mr. Pelicot to partake in the horrific act while she was incapacitated.

Mr. Pelicot’s unexpected testimony came after a tumultuous start to the trial. Just a week in, he was stricken with severe health issues that forced him to miss four consecutive days in court. The head judge ultimately decided to postpone proceedings, as Mr. Pelicot was diagnosed with kidney stones, a kidney infection, and prostate complications, adding yet another layer of complexity to this already harrowing case.

World

Meta Bans Russian State Media Outlets from Social Media Platforms

Explore the implications of Meta’s decision to ban Russian state media outlets from its social media platforms. Understand the impact on information dissemination and the ongoing battle against misinformation in the digital landscape.

Published

3 months ago

September 17, 2024

yönetici

Meta Imposes Global Ban on Russian State Media Outlets

In a significant move, Meta Platforms, Inc., the parent company of Facebook, has announced the prohibition of Russian state media outlets, including RT (Russia Today) and Rossiya Segodnya, from all its social media platforms. The decision stems from the company’s concerns regarding the deceptive strategies employed by these media organizations to execute covert influence operations across the internet.

Meta made this announcement on Monday, emphasizing that the ban will be enforced worldwide across its various platforms, such as Instagram, WhatsApp, and Threads. The rollout of this ban is expected to take place over the coming days.

Statement from Meta

A spokesperson for Meta elaborated on the decision, stating, “After careful consideration, we have expanded our ongoing enforcement actions against Russian state media outlets. As a result, Rossiya Segodnya, RT, and other affiliated entities are now banned from our applications globally due to their involvement in foreign interference activities.”

For further insights into this development, watch the video in the player above.

World

Trump Recalls Alleged Assassination Attempt While Golfing

Explore Donald Trump’s chilling recollection of an alleged assassination attempt he experienced while enjoying a round of golf. Delve into the tense moments and his reflections on safety, fame, and the unpredictability of public life.

Published

3 months ago

September 17, 2024

yönetici

In a recent interview on the social media platform X, Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump recounted a harrowing incident he claims to have experienced while playing golf. Trump described how, during a peaceful Sunday morning round with friends, the tranquility of the day was abruptly shattered by the sound of gunfire in the air.

“It was a beautiful day, everything was just perfect,” Trump reflected. “Then all of a sudden, we heard shots being fired—probably around four or five in total.” He went on to explain that a Secret Service agent was the first to spot the suspect, who was allegedly armed with an AK-47, a powerful assault rifle.

“The agent saw the barrel of the weapon and immediately took action, returning fire at the barrel and aiming in the direction of the bushes,” Trump detailed. “I would have loved to have sunk that last putt, but we decided it was best to leave the scene promptly.”

Trump expressed his gratitude towards the agents and a vigilant civilian who aided in tracking down the suspect, who was eventually apprehended following a high-speed chase.

Suspect Faces Multiple Federal Gun Charges

The FBI has identified the suspect as Ryan Wesley Routh, accusing him of targeting Trump during his time at the golf club in West Palm Beach, Florida. According to an FBI report, Routh had allegedly hidden among the hedges of the golf course for an astonishing 12 hours. Authorities discovered an SKS-style assault rifle, a GoPro camera, and a bag of food at the scene.

The 58-year-old Routh is now facing two serious federal gun charges. If convicted on both counts, he could face a combined maximum sentence of 20 years in prison. Notably, neither of the charges is directly related to an assassination attempt. The first charge pertains to possessing a firearm despite a prior felony conviction, which carries a potential 15-year sentence, a fine of $250,000 (€225,000), and three years of supervised release.

The second charge involves possession of a firearm with an obliterated serial number, which could result in a five-year prison term, the same financial penalties, and also three years of supervised release. As the investigation continues, additional charges could be forthcoming.

While the motive behind Routh’s actions remains unclear, his digital footprint reveals strong political affiliations, particularly concerning issues surrounding Ukraine and China. Routh consistently expressed support for Ukraine across various social media platforms, even claiming to have orchestrated a recruitment scheme for international volunteers aiming to assist Ukraine in its fight against Russia’s invasion. This behavior has been denounced by Ukrainian soldiers and members of the International Legion, who disavowed Routh’s actions and motives.